posts list

레이블이 철학인 게시물을 표시합니다. 모든 게시물 표시
레이블이 철학인 게시물을 표시합니다. 모든 게시물 표시

2014년 10월 6일 월요일

마뉴엘 카스텔 – The Impact of the Internet on Society: A Global Perspective

이제야 근대의 행위이론들을 위한 기술적 기반에 토대를 둔 사회적 행위가 이루어지고 있는 것은 아닌가?  그동안은 개인의 행동패턴을 관찰하기도 힘들었지만 개인들 또한 정보의 인적 속성에 결부되어 자유로운 행위를 할 수 었었다.  정보습득과정의 사호ㅓㅣ적 제한과 한계,  인맥정보에의 의존이 큰 상황에서 자유로운 개인 중심의 행위보다는 관련 정보를 중심으로하는 이너써클이 개인의 행위에 지배적인 영향력을 행사하던 관계구조였다.

가족과 지연중심의 전통적 사회정보관계 -> 소속 사회집단에 따른 정보획득구조 -> 관심사별 개인중심적인 정보 덥근성과 네트워크형성 용이성에 접속 기반의 사회정보관계

http://slownews.kr/30660

마뉴엘 카스텔의 글 – The Impact of the Internet on Society: A Global Perspective

정보화 사회의 이론가이며 정보사회학의 대표적 학자인 마뉴엘 카스텔의 글이 BBVA 오픈마인드에 실렸고, 요약이 MIT 테크놀러지 리뷰에 올라왔다.
USC의 교수인 카스텔(Manuel Castells)은 이제 네트워크 사회가 나를 중심으로 하는 ‘Me-Centered 사회’로 바뀌었고 그 기반에는 SNS가 있다고 보고 있다. 인터넷과 웹은 글로벌 네트워크 사회의 기술 기반이 되었으며, 다양한 차원, 다양한 방식의 커뮤니케이션, 다중 간의 커뮤니케이션이 기본이 되었다고 보고 있다.
내가 중심인 사회
나를 중심으로 한다고 해서 고립이나 커뮤니티의 종말이 오는 것이 아니라 사회관계는 개인의 관심, 가치, 프로젝트를 기반으로 재구성되고 있으며 온라인 상호작용을 오프라인 상호작용, 사이버공간, 지역 공간과 결합하는 과정에서 유사한 생각을 하는 사람들을 찾아냄으로써 커뮤니티를 형성하고 있다.
커뮤니케이션의 변화는 사회정치적 변화를 가져오고 2010년 이후 사람들의 사회 운동을 급격히 변화시켰다. 향후 이러한 로직을 이해하는 것이 연구의 주요 영역이 될 것이며 디지털 커뮤니케이션이 또 다른 피부가 된 젊은 세대를 이해할 수 있게 만들겠지만, 이를 이해 못 하는 이 사회를 끌고 나가는 사람들에게는 여전히 공포와 환상을 제공할 것이라고 주장하고 있다.

2014년 8월 26일 화요일

구글 철학 Google Philosophy

구글 철학
Google Philosophy
 
구글의 10가지 웹에 대한 철학
 
1. 사용자에게 초점을 맞추자
서비스 초창기부터 구글은 사용자가 가장 편리하게 사용할 수 있는 서비스를 제공하는 것을 목표로 하였습니다. 구글은 큰 수익모델이 된다고 하더라도 사이트를 방문하는 사용자에게 도움이 되지 않는 콘텐츠에 대해서는 절대 타협하지 않는 아래와 같은 원칙을 고집하여 왔습니다.
- 인터페이스는 명확하고 간단해야 한다.
- 페이지는 가능한 한 빠른 시간 내에 로드되어야 한다.
- 검색 결과의 게제순위를 절대로 판매하지 않는다.
- 관령성 있는 광고만 제공해야하며, 광고와 검색결과를 혼동하지 않도록 해야 한다.
 
2. 한 분야에서 최고가 되자.
구글은 검색엔진 기업입니다. 첫 번째로 꼽을 수 있는 구글의 강점은, 검색관련 문제해결에 주력함으로써 다른 회사들이 해결하지 못하는 복잡한 검색문제를 해결해 왔으며 이를 통해 최고로 인정 받는 검색 서비스를 제공할 수 있게 된 점입니다. 이제 수백만 사용자가 빠르게 정보를 검색하고 원활하게 검색 서비스를 이용할 수 있게 되었습니다. 검색기능의 혁신을 위해 노력한 결과 이제 구글은 Gmail, 구글 데스크톱, 구글 맵스(Google Maps) 같은 새로운 서비스들을 계속 개발해 선보이면서 검색 서비스 기능을 새로운 여역으로 확대하고 사용자들이 일상 생활에서 훨씬 더 많은 정보를 접하고 이용할 수 있도록 최선을 다하고 있습니다.
 
3. 느린 것보다 빠른 것이 낫다
구글은 사용자가 서비스를 이용한 즉시 만족을 느낄 수 있어야 한다고 생각합니다. 사용자가 바로 해답을 얻기를 원하는 것은 당연한 요구입니다. 구글은 전세계에서 유일하게 사용자들이 사이트에서 오래 머물기 보다는 최대한 빨리 사이트를 떠나도록 하는 것을 목표로 하는 기업입니다.
 
4. 웹 민주주의는 지켜져야 한다.
구글은 어떤 사이트가 가치 있는 콘텐츠를 제공하는지 결정하기 위해 웹 사이트를 게시하는 수천만 명의 사용자들에게 의존하는 방식으로 운영됩니다. 편집자 그룹에 의존하거나 특정 요어가 나타나는 빈도만으로 판단하는 것이 아니라 구글은 PageRank™라는 혁신적인 기술을 이용해 모든 웹 페이지의 순위를 결정합니다. PageRank는 특정 웹 페이지에 링크된 모든 사이트를 평가하고 이들 페이지에 링크된 사이트를 부분적으로 참고하여 평가하고 값을 지정합니다. 웹의 전체 구조를 분석하여 어떤 사이트가 최상의 정보 출처로 “뽀혀TSms지” 결정할 수 있습니다. 즉, 이 사이트에 있는 정보가 가장 많은 관심을 받았음을 의미합니다. 이 기술은 웹 규모가 커지고 새로운 사이트가 정보의 출처가 되고 그 사이트에 대한 투표가 다시 이루어짐에 따라 진화하게 됩니다.
 
5. 데스크톱에서만 검색이 가능한 것은 아니다.
세계가 점점 더 모바일화 되면서 사람들은 위치에 대한 제약 없이, PDA나 무선 전화를 통해, 심지어는 자동차 안에서조차 정보를 편리하게 제공받기를 원합니다. 이 분야에서 구글이 이룩한 기술 혁신으로는 인터넷이 가능한 휴대폰에서 데이터를 찾을때 키패드에 입력하는 횟수를 줄여주는 구글 번호 검색(Google Number Search)과 HTML로 작성된 페이지를 휴대폰의 인터넷 브라우저에서 읽을 수 있는 형식으로 전환하는 동적 변환 시스템을 들 수 있습니다. 이 시스템을 사용하면 원래는 웹 페이지 표시가 불가능한 Palm PDA 및 일본의 I-mode, J-Sky, EZWeb과 같은 장치에서 다양하고 많은 페이지를 볼 수 있습니다.
 
6. 부정적인 방법을 쓰지 않고도 돈을 벌 수 있다.
구글은 검색기술을 다른 회사에 제공하고 AdWords와 AdSense와 같은 온라인 키워드광고 서비스를 통해 구글 사이트 및 기타 사이트에 게재되는 광고 서비스로 매출을 창출하고 있습니다. 그럼에도 불구하고 구글에서 광고를 본 적이 없으신 사용자도 있을 것입니다. 그 이유는 광고가 게재되는 검색 결과 페이지와 고아고가 관련성이 없는 경우에는 구글 검색 결과 페이지에 광고를 게재하는 것이 금지되어 있기 때문입니다. 따라서 구글의 광고는 사용자가 찾으려 하는 대상과 관령성이 있을 때에만 검색 결과 위쪽이나 오른쪽에 스폰서 링크로 나타납니다.
또한 구글은 사용자가 요청한 검색내용을 보는 데 방해가 될 수 있는 팝업 광고를 절대로 허용하지 않으며 광고 게재는 “스폰서 링크”로 확실하게 명시하여 보여줍니다. 검색 결과의 객관성을 유지해야 한다는 것이 구글의 가장 핵십적인 방침이기 때문에 구글은 검색 결과에서 구글 파트너가 더 높은 순위를 얻도록 게재순위를 조작하지 않습니다.
 
7. 정보는 무한대다
구글의 엔지니어들은 다른 어떤 검색 서비스보다 많은 인터넷 상의 페이지를 색인할 수 있는 기술을 개발하였으며, 전화번호, 주소검색기능 및 기업전화번호부를 추가하는 등 새 데이터베이스를 통합하고, 10억개가 넘는 이미지들을 검색할 수 있는 기능을 추가하거나 원래 PDF파일로 작성된 페이지를 보는 방법 등 독창적인 검색기능을 개발해왔습니다. 또한 PDF로 검색결과를 보는 것이 인기를 얻자 구글은 검색에 Microsoft Word, Excel, PowerPoint 등 십여 가지 형식으로 만들어진 파일 형식까지 포함시켰습니다. 무선 사용자를 위해서는 HTML 형식 파일을 모바일기기에서 읽을 수 있는 형식으로 변환하는 독특한 방법을 개발했습니다. 전세계 모든 정보를 검색하고 사용하기 위한 방법을 계속해서 연구하는 한, 위와 같은 구글의 노력은 끊이지 않을 것입니다.
 
8. 정보 요구에는 국경이 없다.
구글의 본사는 캘리포니아에 위치하고 있지만 전세계에 지사를 두고 전세계 사용자들이 정보를 쉽게 이용할 수 있도록 하는 것을 목표로 하고 있습니다. 구글의 검색 결과는 사용자의 환경 설정에 따라 35가지가 넘는 언어로 표시되며, 모국어와 상관없이 모든 사용자에게 콘텐츠를 제공하고, 약 100가지 언어로 사용자가 정의할 수 있는 번역 기능을 제공합니다. 한편 새로운 언어를 신속히 추가하기 위해 Google.com 웹 사이트에 있는 자동화 도구를 통해 자원 봉사자들이 번역을 지원할 수 있도록 하고 있습니다.
 
9. 꼭 정장을 입어야만 진지하게 업무에 임하는 것은 아니다.
구글의 창업자들은 검색 외에는 어떤 것도 심각하게 받아들일 필요는 없다고 말합니다. 업무는 힘이 들더라도 즐겁게 할 수 있어야 한다는 믿음을 바탕으로 회사를 설립했기 때문에 구글의 기업 문화는 다른 기업과 다릅니다. 온라인 서비스와 관련해 항상 고객이 우선인 것처럼 일상 생활에서 구글은 직원을 우선으로 생각합니다. 팀으로서의 성취와 개개인의 성취에 대한 자부심이 회사의 전체적인 성공에 기여할 수 있음을 강조합니다. 아이디어를 교환하고 시험해보고 실제로 시행해보기까지 모든 과정이 어지러울 정도로 민첩하게 진행됩니다. 이처럼 대화가 편안한 업무환경은 생산성 향상은 물론 동료애를 꾀하고, 또한 수만명의 사용자들이 구글 검색결과를 신뢰하고 있다는 사실이 더욱 의욕을 북돋아 줍니다.
 
10. 최고에 만족하지 말자
항상 기대를 능가하는 서비스를 제공하고자 노력하는 구글에게 최고란 끝이 아닌 시작일 뿐입니다. 기술 혁신과 반복을 통해 구글은 전세계적으로 아직 고객들이 표출하지 않은 요구까지 미리 예측하여 새로운 표준을 수립하는 제품과 서비스로 제공함으로써 사용자들의 욕구를 충족시켜 왔습니다.


http://googlekorcam.blogspot.com/2010/10/google-philosophy.html

2014년 8월 14일 목요일

The Information Philosopher

The Information Philosopher
The Freedom section of Information Philosopher is now a book.
Click here for infoClick for information about <i>Free Will: The Scandal in Philosophy</i>
What is information? How is it created? Why is it a better tool for examining philosophical problems than traditional logic or linguistic analysis? Has information philosophy actually solved any problems?
What is information?
The simple definition of information is the act of informing - the communication of knowledge from a sender to a receiver that informs (literally shapes) the receiver.A message that is certain to tell you something you already know contains no new information.
If everything that happens was certain to happen, as determinist philosophers claim, no new information would ever enter the universe. Information would be a universal constant. There would be "nothing new under the sun." Every past and future event can in principle be known by a super-intelligence with access to such a fixed totality of information (Laplace's Demon).
The total amount of mass and energy in the universe is a constant. A fundamental law of nature is the conservation of mass and energy.
But information is neither matter nor energy, though it needs matter to be embodied and energy to be communicated. Information can be created and destroyed. It is the modern spirit, the ghost in the machine, the mind in the body. It is the soul, and when we die, it is our information that perishes. The matter remains. Information is a potential objective value, the ultimate sine qua non.
How is information created?
Ex nihilo, nihil fit, said the ancients, Nothing comes from nothing. But information is no (material) thing. Information is physical, but it is not material. Information is aproperty of material. We can create something (immaterial) from nothing!
But we shall find that it takes a special kind of energy (free or available energy, with negative entropy) to do so.Information is not constant. Where matter and energy are conserved quantities in physics, information is not conserved. We know that information is being createdbecause the universe began some thirteen billion years ago in a state of minimal information. The "Big Bang" was formless radiation, pure energy, no material particles. How matter formed into information structures like the galaxies, stars, and planets is the beginning of a story that will end with understanding how human minds emerged to understand our place in the astrophysical universe.
We identify three fundamental processes of information creation - the purely material, the biological, and the mental. The first was the "order out of chaos" when matter formed from radiation and the expansion of the early universe led to the gravitational attraction of randomly distributed matter into highly organized galaxies, stars, and planets. The expansion - the increased space between material objects - drives the universe away from thermodynamic equilibrium (maximum entropy) and creates negative entropy, a quantitative measure of the order that is the basis for all information.
A second kind of information creation was when the first molecule on earth replicated itself and went on to duplicate its information exponentially. Accidental errors in the duplication provided variations in reproductive success. Most important, besides creating information structures, biological systems are alsoinformation processors. They use information to guide their actions.
The third process of information creation, and the most important to philosophy, is human creativity. Almost every philosopher since philosophy began has considered the mind as something distinct from the body. We can now explain that distinction. The mind is the immaterial information in the brain. The brain, part of the material body, is a biological information processor. As some philosophers have speculated, the mind is software in the brain hardware.
The most important information created in a mind is a recording of an individual's experiences (sensations). Recordings are played back (automatically and perhaps mostly unconsciously) as a guide to evaluate future actions (volitions) in similar situations. The particular past experiences reproduced are those stored in the brain located near elements of the current experience.
Sensations are recorded as the mental effects of physical causes.
They are stored as retrievable information in the mind of an individual self. Recordings include not only the five afferent senses but also the internal emotions - feelings of pleasure, pain, hopes, and fears - that accompany the experience.
Volitions are mental causes of physical effects. They begin with 1) reproduction of past experiences that are similar to the current experience as thoughts about possible actions and the (partly random) generation of other alternative possibilities for action. They continue with 2) evaluation of those freely generated thoughts and a willful selection (sometimes habitual) of one of those actions.
Volitions end with 3) the sensations coming back to the mind indicating that the self has caused the action to happen (or not). This feedback is recorded as further retrievable information, reinforcing the knowledge stored in the mind that the individual self can cause this kind of action (or not).
Why is information better than logic and language for solving philosophical problems?
The theory of communication of information is the foundation of our "information age." To understand how we know things is to understand how knowledgerepresents the material world of embodied "information structures" in the mental world of immaterial ideas.All knowledge starts with the recording of experiences. The experiences of thinking, perceiving, knowing, feeling, desiring, deciding, and acting may be bracketed by philosophers as "mental" phenomena, but they are no less real than other "physical" phenomena. They are themselves physical phenomena.
They are just not material things.

All science begins with information gathered from experimental observations, which are mental phenomena. So all knowledge of the physical world rests on the mental. All scientific knowledge is shared information and as such science is immaterial and mental, some might say fundamental. Recall Descartes' argument that the experience of thinking is that which for him is the most certain.
The analysis of language, particularly the analysis of philosophical concepts, which dominated philosophy in the twentieth century, has failed to solve the most ancientphilosophical problems. At best, it claims to "dis-solve" some of them as conceptualpuzzles. The "problem of knowledge" itself, traditionally framed as "justifying true belief," is recast by informaton philosophy as the degree of isomorphism between the information in the physical world and the information in our minds. Psychology can be defined as the study of this isomorphism.
We shall see how information processes in the natural world use arbitrary symbols (e.g., nucleotide sequences) to refer to something, to communicate messages about it, and to give the symbol meaning in the form of instructions for another process to do something (e.g., create a protein). These examples provide support for both theories of meaning as reference and meaning as use.
Note that just as language philosophy is not the philosophy of language, so information philosophy is not the philosophy of information. It is rather the use of information as a tool to study philosophical problems, some of which are today yielding tentative solutions. It is time for philosophy to move beyond logical puzzles and language games.
What problems has information philosophy solved?
Why has philosophy made so little progress? Is it because philosophers prefer problems, while scientists seek solutions? Must a philosophical problem solved become science and leave philosophy? The information philosopher thinks not.But in order to remain philosophy, interested philosophers must themselves examine the proposed information-based solutions and consider them as part of the critical philosophical dialogue.
The full story of cosmic, biological, and mental information creation involves learning some basic physics, particularly quantum mechanics and thermodynamics, along with some information theory. The information philosopher website provides animated visualizations of the most basic concepts that you will need to become an information philosopher.
When you are ready to consider them, among the proposed solutions are:
It turns out that the methodology of information philosophy can be productively applied to some outstanding problems in physics. Philosophers of science might take an interest in the proposed information-based solutions to these problems.
The Fundamental Question of Information Philosophy
Our fundamental philosophical question is cosmological and ultimately metaphysical.
What are the processes that create emergent information structures in the universe?
Given the second law of thermodynamics, which says that any system will over time approach a thermodynamic equilibrium of maximum disorder or entropy, in which all information is lost, and given the best current model for the origin of the universe, which says everything began in a state of thermodynamic equilibrium some 13.75 billion years ago, how can it be that living beings are creating and communicating vast amounts of new information every day?
Why are we not still in that original state of equilibrium?
Broadly speaking, there are four major phenomena or processes that can reduce the entropy locally, while of course increasing it globally to satisfy the second law of thermodynamics. Three of these do it "blindly," the fourth does it with a built-in "purpose," or telos."
  1. Universal Gravitation
  2. Quantum Cooperative Phenomena (e.g., crystallization, the formation of atoms and molecules)
  3. "Dissipative" Chaos (Non-linear Dynamics)
  4. Life
None of these processes can work unless they have a way to get rid of the positive entropy (disorder) and leave behind a pocket of negative entropy (order or information). The positive entropy is either conducted, convected, or radiated away as waste matter and energy, as heat, or as pure radiation. At the quantum level, it is always the result of interactions between matter and radiation (photons). Whenever photons interact with material particles, the outcomes are inherently unpredictable. As Albert Einstein discovered ten years before the founding of quantum mechanics, these interactions involve irreducible ontological chance.
Negative entropy is an abstract thermodynamic concept that describes energy with the ability to do work, to make something happen. This kind of energy is often called free energy or available energy. In a maximally disordered state (called thermodynamic equilibrium) there can be matter in motion, the motion we call heat. But the average properties - density, pressure, temperature - are the same everywhere. Equilibrium is formless. Departures from equilibrium are when the physical situation shows differences from place to place. These differences are information.
The second law of thermodynamics is then simply that isolated systems will eliminate differences from place to place until the various properties are uniform. Natural processes spontaneously destroy information. Consider the classic case of what happens when we open a perfume bottle.
Ludwig Boltzmann derived a mathematical formula for entropy as a summation of the probabilities of finding a system in all the possible states of a system. When every state is equally probable, entropy is at a maximum, and no differences (information) are visible. The formula for negative entropy is just the maximum possible entropy minus the actual entropy(when there are differences from place to place).
Claude Shannon derived the mathematical formula for information and found it to be identical to the formula for negative entropy - a summation of the probabilities of all the possible messages that can be communicated.
Because "negative" entropy (order or information) is such a positive quantity, we chose many years ago to give it a new name - "Ergo," and to call the four phenomena or processes that create it "ergodic," for reasons that will become clear. But today, the positive name "information" is all that we need to do philosophical work.
Answering the Fundamental Question of Information Philosophy
How exactly has the universe escaped from the total disorder of thermodynamic equilibrium and produced a world full of information?
It begins with the expansion of the universe. If the universe had not expanded, it would have remained in the original state of thermodynamic equilibrium. We would not be here.
To visualize the departure from equilibrium that made us possible, remember that equilibrium is when particles are distributed evenly in all possible locations in space, and with their velocities distributed by a normal law - the Maxwell-Boltzmann velocity distribution. (The combination of position space and velocity or momentum space is called phase space). When we open the perfume bottle, the molecules now have a much larger phase space to distribute into. There are a much larger number of phase space "cells" in which molecules could be located. It of course takes them time to spread out and come to a new equilibrium state (the Boltzmann "relaxation time.")
When the universe expands, say grows to ten times its volume, it is just like the perfume bottle opening. The matter particles must redistribute themselves to get back to equilibrium. But suppose the universe expansion rate is much faster than the relaxation time. The universe is out of equilibrium, and it will never get back!
In the earliest moments of the universe, material particles were yet stable. Pure radiation energy was in equilibrium at extraordinarily high temperatures. When material particles appeared, they were blasted back into radiation by photon collisions. As the universe expanded, the temperature cooled, the space per photon was increased and the mean free time between photon collisions increased, giving particles a better chance to survive. The expansion red-shifted the photons. The average energy per photon decreased, eventually reducing the number of high energy photons that destroyed the matter. Quarks and electrons became more common. The mean free path of photons was very short. They were being scattered by collisions with electrons.
When temperatures continued to decline, quarks combined into nuclear particles, protons and neutrons. When temperature declined further, to 5000 degrees, about 400,000 years after the "Big Bang," the electrons and protons combined to make hydrogen atoms.
At this time, a major event occurred that we can still see today, the farthest and earliest event visible. When the electrons combined into atoms, the electrons could no longer scatter the photons as easily. The universe became transparent for the photons. Some of those photons are still arriving at the earth today. They are now red-shifted and cooled down to the cosmic microwave background radiation. While this radiation is almost perfectly uniform, it shows very small fluctuations that may be caused by random difference in the local density of the original radiation or even in random quantum fluctuations.
These fluctuations mean that there were slight differences in density of the newly formed hydrogen gas clouds. The force of universal gravitation then worked to pull relatively formless matter into spherically symmetric stars and planets, the original order out of chaos (although this phrase is now most associated with the work on deterministic chaos theory and complexity theory, as we shall see.
How information creation and negative entropy flows appear to violate the second law of thermodynamics
In our open and rapidly expanding universe, the maximum possible entropy (if the particles were "relaxed" into a uniform distribution among the new phase-space cells) is increasing faster than the actual entropy. The difference between maximum possible entropy and the current entropy is called negative entropy. There is an intimate connection between the physical quantity negative entropy and abstract immaterial information, first established by Leo Szilard in 1929.
As pointed out by Harvard cosmologist David Layzer, the Arrow of Time points not only to increasing disorder but also to increasing information.
Two of our "ergodic" phenomena - gravity and quantum cooperative phenomena - pull matter together that was previously separated. Galaxies, stars, and planets form out of inchoate clouds of dust and gas. Gravity binds the matter together. Subatomic particles combine to form atoms. Atoms combine to form molecules. They are held together by quantum mechanics. In all these cases, a new visible information structure appears.
In order for these structures to stay together, the motion (kinetic) energy of their parts must be radiated away. This is why the stars shine. When atoms join to become molecules, they give off photons. The new structure is now in a (negative) bound energy state. It is the radiation that carries away the positive entropy (disorder) needed to balance the new order (information) in the visible structure.
In the cases of chaotic dissipative structures and life, the ergodic phenomena are more complex, but the result is similar, the emergence of visible information. (More commonly it is simply the maintenance of high-information, low-entropy structures.) These cases appear in far-from-equilibrium situations where there is a flow of matter and energy with negative entropy through the information structure. The flow comes in with low entropy but leaves with high entropy. Matter and energy are conserved in the flow, but information in the structure can increase (information is not a conserved quantity).
Information is neither matter nor energy, though it uses matter when it is embodied and energy when it is communicated. Information is immaterial.
This vision of life as a visible form through which matter and energy flow was first seen byLudwig van Bertlanffy in 1939, though it was made more famous by Erwin Schrödinger's landmark essay What Is Life? in 1945, where he claimed that "life feeds on negative entropy."
Both Bertalanffy and Schrödinger knew that the source of negative entropy was our Sun. Neither knew that the ultimate cosmological source of negative entropy is the expansion of the universe, which allowed ergodic gravitation forces to form the Sun. Note the positive entropy leaving the Sun becomes diluted as it expands, creating a difference between its energy temperature and energy density. This difference is information (negative entropy) that planet Earth uses to generate and maintain biological life.
Note that the 273K (the average earth temperature) photons are dissipated into the dark night sky, on their way to the cosmic microwave background. The Sun-Earth-night sky is a heat engine, with a hot energy source and cold energy sink, that converts the temperature difference not into mechanical energy (work) but into biological energy (life).

When information is embodied in a physical structure, two physical processes must occur.
Our first process is whatJohn von Neumanndescribed as
irreversible Process 1.
The first process is the collapse of a quantum-mechanical wave function into one of the possible states in a superposition of states, which happens in any measurement process. A measurement produces one or more bits of information. Such quantum events involve irreducible indeterminacy and chance, but less often noted is the fact that quantum physics is directly responsible for the extraordinary temporal stability and adequate determinism of most information structures.
We can call the transfer of positive entropy, which stabilizes the new information from Process 1, Process 1b.
The second process is a local decrease in the entropy (which appearsto violate the second law of thermodynamics) corresponding to the increase in information. Entropy greater than the information increase must be transferred away from the new information, ultimately to the night sky and the cosmic background, to satisfy the second law.
Given this new stable information, to the extent that the resulting quantum system can be approximately isolated, the system will deterministically evolve according to von Neumann's Process 2, the unitary time evolution described by the Schrödinger equation.
The first two physical processes (1 and 1b) are parts of the information solution to the "problem of measurement," to which must be added the role of the "observer."
The discovery and elucidation of the first two as steps in the cosmic creation process casts light on some classical problems in philosophy and physics , since it is the same two-step process that creates new biological species and explains the freedom and creativity of the human mind.
The cosmic creation process generates the conditions without which there could be nothing ofvalue in the universe, nothing to be known, and no one to do the knowing. Information itself is the ultimate sine qua non.

The Three Kinds of Information Emergence
Note there are three distinct kinds of emergence:
  1. the order out of chaos when the randomly distributed matter in the early universe first gets organized into information structures.This was not possible before the first atoms formed about 400,000 years after the Big Bang. Information structures like the stars and galaxies did not exist before about 400 million years. As we saw, gravitation was the principal driver creating information structures.
    Nobel prize winner Ilya Prigogine discovered another ergodic process that he described as the "self-organization" of "dissipative structures." He popularized the slogan "order out of chaos" in an important book. Unfortunately, the "self" in self-organization led to some unrealizable hopes in cognitive psychology. There is no self, in the sense of a person or agent, in these physical phenomena.
    Both gravitation and Prigogine's dissipative systems produce a purely physical/material kind of order. The resulting structures contain information. There is a "steady state" flow of information-rich matter and energy through them. But they do not process information. They have no purpose, no "telos."
    Order out of chaos can explain the emergence of downward causation on their atomic and molecular components. But this is a gross kind of downward causal control. Explaining life and mind as "complex adaptive systems" has not been successful. We need to go beyond "chaos and complexity" theories to teleonomic theories.
  2. the order out of order when the material information structures form self-replicatingbiological information structures. These are information processing systems.In his famous essay, "What Is Life?," Erwin Schrödinger noted that life "feeds on negative entropy" (or information). He called this "order out of order."
    This kind of biological processing of information first emerged about 3.5 billion years ago on the earth. It continues today on multiple emergent biological levels, e.g., single-cells, multi-cellular systems, organs, etc., each level creating new information structures and information processing systems not reducible to (caused by) lower levels and exertingdownward causation on the lower levels.
    And this downward causal control is extremely fine, managing the motions and arrangements of individual atoms and molecules.
    Biological systems are cognitive systems, using internal "subjective" knowledge to recognize and interact with their "objective" external environment, communicating meaningful messages to their internal components and to other individuals of their species with a language of arbitrary symbols, taking actions to maintain themselves and to expand their populations by learning from experience.
    With the emergence of life, "purpose" also entered the universe. It is not the pre-existent "teleology" of many idealistic philosophies (the idea of "essence" before "existence"), but it is the "entelechy" of Aristotle, who saw that living things have within them a purpose, an end, a "telos." To distinguish this evolved telos in living systems from teleology, modern biologists use the term "teleonomy."
  3. the pure information out of order when organisms with minds generate, store (in the brain), replicate, utilize, and then externalize some non-biological information, communicating it to other minds and storing it in the environment. Communication can be by hereditary genetic transmission or by an advanced organism capable of learning and then teaching its contemporaries directly by signaling, by speaking, or indirectly by writing and publishing the knowledge for future generations.This kind of information can be highly abstract mind-stuff, pure Platonic ideas, the stock in trade of philosophers. It is neither matter nor energy (though embodied in the material brain), a kind of pure spirit or ghost in the machine. It is a candidate for the immaterial dualist "substance" of René Descartes, though it is probably better thought of as a "property dualism," since information is an immaterial property of all matter.
    The information stored in the mind is not only abstract ideas. It contains a recording of the experiences of the individual. In principle every experience may be recorded, though not all may be reproducible/recallable.
The negative entropy (order, or potential information) generated by the universe expansion is a tiny amount compared to the increase in positive entropy (disorder). Sadly, this is always the case when we try to get "order out of order," as can be seen by studying entropy flows at different levels of emergent phenomena.
In any process, the positive entropy increase is always at least equal to, and generally orders of magnitude larger than, the negative entropy in any created information structures, to satisfy the second law of thermodynamics. The positive entropy is named for Boltzmann, since it was his "H-Theorem" that proved entropy can only increase overall - the second law of thermodynamics. And negative entropy is called Shannon, since his theory of information communication has exactly the same mathematical formula as Boltzmann's famous principle;
S = k log W
where S is the entropy, k is Boltzmann's constant, and W is the probability of the given state of the system.


Material particles are the first information structures to form in the universe.. They are quarks, baryons, and atomic nuclei, which combine with electrons to form atoms and eventually molecules, when the temperature is low enough. These particles are attracted by the force of universal gravitation to form the gigantic information structures of the galaxies, stars, and planets.

Microscopic quantum mechanical particles and huge self-gravitating systems are stable and have extremely long lifetimes, thanks in large part to quantum stability. Stars are another source of radiation, after the original Big Bang cosmic source, which has cooled down to 3 degrees Kelvin (3°K) and shines as the cosmic microwave background radiation.

Our solar radiation has a high color temperature (5000K) and a low energy-content temperature (273K). It is out of equilibrium and it is the source of all the information-generating negative entropy that drives biological evolution on the Earth. Note that the fraction of the light falling on Earth is less than a billionth of that which passes by and is lost in space.
A tiny fraction of the solar energy falling on the earth gets converted into the information structures of plants and animals. Most of it gets converted to heat and is radiated away as waste energy to the night sky.

Every biological structure is a quantum mechanical structure. DNA has maintained its stable information structure over billions of years in the constant presence of chaos and noise.

The stable information content of a human being survives many changes in the material content of the body during a person’s lifetime. Only with death does the mental information (spirit, soul) dissipate - unless it is saved somewhere.
The total mental information in a living human is orders of magnitude less than the information content and information processing rate of the body. But the information structures created by humans outside the body, in the form of external knowledge like this book, and the enormous collection of human artifacts, rival the total biological information content.

The Shannon Principle
In his development of the mathematical theory of the communication of information, Claude Shannon showed that there can be no new information in a message unless there are multiple possible messages. If only one message is possible, there is no information in that message.
We can simplify this to define the Shannon Principle. No new information can be created in the universe unless there are multiple possibilities, only one of which can become actual.
An alternative statement of the Shannon principle is that in a deterministic system, information is conserved, unchanging with time. Classical mechanics is a conservative system that conserves not only energy and momentum but also conserves the total information. Information is a "constant of the motion" in a determinist world.
Quantum mechanics, by contrast, is indeterministic. It involves irreducible ontological chance. An isolated quantum system is described by a wave function ψ which evolves according to the unitary time evolution of the linear Schrödinger equation,
i ℏ d | ψ > / dt = H | ψ >.
But isolation is an ideal that can only be approximately realized. Because the Schrödinger equation is linear, a wave function | ψ > can be a linear combination (a superposition) of another set of wave functions | φn >,
| ψ > =  cn | φn >,
where the cn coefficients squared are the probabilities of finding the system in the possible state | φn > as the result of an interaction with another quantum system.
cn2 = < ψ | φn >2.
Quantum mechanics introduces real possibilities, each with a calculable probability of becoming an actuality, as a consequence of one quantum system interacting (for example colliding) with another quantum system.
It is quantum interactions that lead to new information in the universe - both new information structures and information processing systems. But that new information cannot subsist unless a compensating amount of entropy is transferred away from the new information.
And it is only in cases where information persists long enough for a human being to observe it that we can properly describe the observation as a "measurement" and the human being as an "observer." Following von Neumann's "process" terminology, we might complete his admittedly unsuccessful attempt at a theory of the measuring process with the anthropomorphic
Process 3 - a conscious observer recording new information (knowledge) in a human mind.

In less than two decades of the mid-twentieth century, the word information was transformed from a synonym for knowledge into a mathematical, physical, and biological quantity that can be measured and studied scientifically.
In 1929, Leo Szilard connected an increase in thermodynamic (Boltzmann) entropy with any increase in information that results from a measurement, solving the problem of "Maxwell's Demon," a thought experiment suggested by James Clerk Maxwell, in which a local reduction in entropy is possible when an intelligent being interacts with a thermodynamic system.
In the early 1940s, digital computers were invented, by Alan Turing, Claude ShannonJohn von Neumann, and others, that could run a stored program to manipulate stored data.
Then in the late 1940s, the problem of communicating digital data signals in the presence ofnoise was first explored by Shannon, who developed the modern mathematical theory of the communication of information. Norbert Wiener wrote in his 1948 book Cybernetics that "information is the negative of the quantity usually defined as entropy," and in 1949 Leon Brillouin coined the term "negentropy."
Finally, in the early 1950s, inheritable characteristics were shown by Francis Crick, James Watson, and George Gamow to be transmitted from generation to generation in a digital code.

Information is Immaterial
Information is neither matter nor energy, but it needs matter for its embodiment and energy for its communication.
A living being is a form through which passes a flow of matter and energy (with low entropy). Genetic information is used to build the information-rich matter into an information-processing structure that contains a very large number of hierarchically organized information structures.
All biological systems are cognitive, using their internal information structure to guide their actions. Even some of the simplest organisms can learn from experience. The most primitive minds are experience recorders and reproducers.
In humans, the information-processing structures create new actionable information (knowledge) by consciously and unconsciously reworking the experiences stored in the mind.
Emergent higher levels exert downward causation on the contents of the lower levels, ultimately supporting mental causation and free will.
When a ribosome assembles 330 amino acids in four symmetric polypeptide chains (globins), each globin traps an iron atom in a heme group at the center to form the hemoglobin protein. This is downward causal control of the amino acids, the heme groups, and the iron atoms by the ribosome. The ribosome is an example of Erwin Schrödinger's emergent "order out of order," life "feeding on the negative entropy" of digested food.
Notice the absurdity of the idea that the random motions of the transfer RNA molecules (green in the video at right), each holding a single amino acid (red), are carrying pre-determined information of where they belong in the protein being built.
Determinism is an emergent property and an ideal philosophical concept, unrealizable except approximately in the kind of adequate determinism that we experience in the macroscopic world, where the determining information is part of the higher-level control system.
The total information in multi-cellular living beings can develop to be many orders of magnitude more than the information present in the original cell. The creation of this new information would be impossible for a deterministic universe, in which information is constant.
Immaterial information is perhaps as close as a physical or biological scientist can get to the idea of a soul or spirit that departs the body at death. When a living being dies, it is the maintenance of biological information that ceases. The matter remains.
Biological systems are different from purely physical systems primarily because they create, store, and communicate information. Living things store information in a memory of the past that they use to shape their future. Fundamental physical objects like atoms have no history.
And when human beings export some of their personal information to make it a part of human culture, that information moves closer to becoming immortal.
Human beings differ from other animals in their extraordinary ability to communicate information and store it in external artifacts. In the last decade the amount of external information per person may have grown to exceed an individual's purely biological information.
Since the 1950's, the science of human behavior has changed dramatically from a "black box" model of a mind that started out as a "blank slate" conditioned by environmental stimuli. Today's mind model contains many "functions" implemented with stored programs, all of them information structures in the brain. The new "computational model" of cognitive science likens the brain to a computer, with some programs and data inherited and others developed as appropriate reactions to experience.

The Experience Recorder and Reproducer
The brain should be regarded less as an algorithmic computer with one or more central processing units than as a multi-channel and multi-track experience recorder and reproducerwith an extremely high data rate. Information about an experience - the sights, sounds, smells, touch, and taste - is recorded along with the emotions - feelings of pleasure, pain, hopes, and fears - that accompany the experience. When confronted with similar experiences later, the brain can reproduce information about the original experience (an instant replay) that helps to guide current actions.
Information is constant in a deterministic universe. There is "nothing new under the sun." Thecreation of new information is not possible without the random chance and uncertainty of quantum mechanics, plus the extraordinary temporal stability of quantum mechanical structures.
It is of the deepest philosophical significance that information is based on the mathematics ofprobability. If all outcomes were certain, there would be no "surprises" in the universe. Information would be conserved and a universal constant, as some mathematicians mistakenly believe. Information philosophy requires the ontological uncertainty and probabilistic outcomes of modern quantum physics to produce new information.
But at the same time, without the extraordinary stability of quantized information structures over cosmological time scales, life and the universe we know would not be possible. Quantum mechanics reveals the architecture of the universe to be discrete rather than continuous, to bedigital rather than analog.
Moreover, the "correspondence principle" of quantum mechanics and the "law of large numbers" of statistics ensures that macroscopic objects can normally average out microscopic uncertainties and probabilities to provide the "adequate determinism" that shows up in all our "Laws of Nature."
Information philosophy explores some classical problems in philosophy with deeper and more fundamental insights than is possible with the logic and language approach of modern analytic philosophy.
By exploring the origins of structure in the universe, information philosophy transcendshumanity and even life itself, though it is not a mystical metaphysical transcendence.
Information philosophy uncovers the providential creative process working in the universe
to which we owe our existence, and therefore perhaps our reverence.
It locates the fundamental source of all values not in humanity ("man the measure"), not in bioethics ("life the ultimate good"), but in the origin and evolution of the cosmos.
Information philosophy is an idealistic philosophy, a process philosophy, and a systematic philosophy, the first in many decades. It provides important new insights into the Kantian transcendental problems of epistemologyethicsfreedom of the willgod, and immortality, as well as the mind-body problemconsciousness, and the problem of evil.
In physics, information philosophy provides new insights into the problem of measurement, the paradox of Schrödinger's Cat, the two paradoxes of microscopic reversibility and macroscopic recurrence that Josef Loschmidt and Ernst Zermelo used to criticize Ludwig Boltzmann's explanation of the entropy increase required by the second law of thermodynamics, and finally information provides a better understanding of the entanglement and nonlocality phenomena that are the basis for modern quantum cryptography and quantum computing.

Information Philosophers, as do all who would make an advance in knowledge, stand on the shoulders of giant philosophers and scientists of the past and present as we try to make modest advances in the great philosophical problems of knowledgevalue, and freedom.In the left-hand column of all pages are links to nearly three hundred philosophers and scientists who have made contributions to these great problems. Their web pages include the original contributions of each thinker, with examples of their thought, usually in their own words, and where possible in their original languages as well.

Traditional philosophy is a story about discovery of timeless truths, laws of nature, a block universe in which the future is a logical extension of the past, a primal moment of creation that starts a causal chain in which everything can be foreknown by an omniscient being. Traditional philosophy seeks knowledge in logical reasoning with clear and unchanging concepts.Its guiding lights are thinkers like Parmenides, Plato, and Kant, who sought unity and identity, being and universals.
In traditional philosophy, the total amount of information in the conceptually closed universe is static, a physical constant of nature. The laws of nature allow no exceptions, they are perfectly causal. Everything that happens is said to have a physical cause. This is called "causal closure".   Chance and change - in a deep philosophical sense - are said to be illusions.
Information philosophy, by contrast, is a story about invention, about novelty, about biologicalemergence and new beginnings unseen and unseeable beforehand, a past that is fixed but an ambiguous future that can be shaped by teleonomic changes in the present.
Its model thinkers are Heraclitus, Protagoras, Aristotle, and Hegel, for whom time, place, and particular situations mattered.
Information philosophy is built on probabilistic laws of nature. The fundamental challenge for information philosophy is to explain the emergence of stable information structures from primordial and ever-present chaos, to account for the phenomenal success of deterministic laws when the material substrate of the universe is irreducibly chaotic, noisy, and random, and to understand the concepts of truth, necessity, and certainty in a universe of chance, contingency, and indeterminacy.
Determinism and the exceptionless causal and deterministic laws of classical physics are the real illusions. Determinism is information-preserving. In an ideal deterministic Laplacianuniverse, the present state of the universe is implicitly contained in its earliest moments.
This ideal determinism does not exist. The "adequate determinism" behind the laws of natureemerged from the early years of the universe when there was only indeterministic chaos.
In a random noisy environment, how can anything be regular and appear determined? It is because the macroscopic consequences of the law of large numbers average out microscopic quantum fluctuations to provide us with a very adequate determinism.
Information Philosophy is an account of continuous information creation, a story about the origin and evolution of the universe, of life, and of intelligence from an original quantal chaos that is still present in the microcosmos. More than anything else, it is the creation and maintenance of stable information structures that distinguishes biology from physics and chemistry.
Living things maintain information in a memory of the past that they can use to shape the future. Some get it via heredity. Some learn it from experience. Others invent it!
Information Philosophy is a story about knowledge and ignorance, about good and evil, aboutfreedom and determinism.

There is a great battle going on - between originary chaos and emergent cosmos. The struggle is between destructive chaotic processes that drive a microscopic underworld of random eventsversus constructive cosmic processes that create information structures with extraordinary emergent properties that include adequately determined scientific laws -
despite, and in many cases making use of, the microscopic chaos.
Created information structures range from galaxies, stars, and planets, to molecules, atoms, and subatomic particles. They are the structures of terrestrial life from viruses and bacteria to sentient and intelligent beings. And they are the constructed ideal world of thought, of intellect, of spirit, including the laws of nature, in which we humans play a role as co-creator.
Based on insights into these cosmic creation processes, the Information Philosopher proposes three primary ideas that are new approaches to perennial problems in philosophy. They are likely to change some well-established philosophical positions. Even more important, they may reconcile idealism and materialism and provide a new view of how humanity fits into the universe.

The three ideas are
  • An explanation or epistemological model of knowledge formation and communication. Knowledge and information are neither matter nor energy, but they require matter for expression and energy for communication. They seem to be metaphysical.
    Briefly, we identify knowledge with actionable information in the brain-mind. We justify knowledge by behavioral studies that demonstrate the existence of information structures implementing functions in the brain. And we verifyknowledge scientifically.
  • A basis for objective value beyond humanism and bioethics, grounded in the fundamental information creation processes behind the structure and evolution of the universe and the emergence of life.
    Briefly, we find positive value (or good) in information structures. We see negative value (or evil) in disorder and entropy tearing down such structures. We call energy with low entropy "Ergo" and call anti-entropic processes "ergodic."
    Our first categorical imperative is then "act in such a way as to create, maintain, and preserve information as much as possible against destructive entropic processes."Our second ethical imperative is "share knowledge/information to the maximum extent." Like love, our own information is not diminished when we share it with others
    Our third moral imperative is "educate (share the knowledge of what is right) rather than punish." Knowledge is virtue. Punishment wastes human capital and provokes revenge.
  • Watch a 10-minute animated tutorial on theTwo-Stage Solution to
    the Free Will Problem
    scientific model for free will and creativity informed by the complementary roles of microscopic randomness and adequate macroscopic determinism in a temporal sequence that generatesinformation.
    Briefly, we separate "free" and "will" in a two-stage process - first the free generation of alternative possibilities for action, then anadequately determined decision by the will. We call this two-stage view ourCogito model and trace the idea of a two-stage model in the work of a dozen thinkers back to William James in 1884.This model is a synthesis of adequate determinism and limited indeterminism, a coherent and complete compatibilism that reconciles
    free will with both determinism and indeterminism.
    David Hume reconciled freedom with determinism. We reconcile free will with indeterminism.
    Because it makes free will compatible with both a form of determinism (reallydetermination) and with an indeterminism that is limited and controlled by the mind, the leading libertarian philosopher Bob Kane suggested we call this model "Comprehensive Compatibilism."
    The problem of free will cannot be solved by logic, language, or even by physics. Man is not a machine and the mind is not a computer.
    Free will is a biophysical information problem.
All three ideas depend on understanding modern cosmology, physics, biology, and neuroscience, but especially the intimate connection between quantum mechanics and the second law of thermodynamics that allows for the creation of new information structures.
All three are based on the theory of information, which alone can establish the existential status of ideas, not just the ideas of knowledge, value, and freedom, but other-worldly speculations in natural religion like God and immortality.
All three have been anticipated by earlier thinkers, but can now be defended on strong empirical grounds. Our goal is less to innovate than to reach the best possible consensus among philosophers living and dead, an intersubjective agreement between philosophers that is the surest sign of a knowledge advance in natural science.
This Information Philosopher website aims to be an open resource for the best thinking ofphilosophers and scientists on these three key ideas and a number of lesser ideas that remain challenging problems in philosophy - on which information philosophy can shed some light.
Among these are the mind-body problem (the mind can be seen as the realm of information in its free thoughts, the body an adequately determined biological system creating and maintaining information); the common sense intuition of a cosmic creative process often anthropomorphized as a God or divine Providence; the problem of evil (chaotic entropic forces are the devil incarnate); and the "hard problem" of consciousness (agents responding to their environment, and originating new causal chains, based on information processing).
Philosophy is the love of knowledge or wisdom. Information philosophy (I-Phi or ΙΦ) quantifies knowledge as actionable information.
What is information that merits its use as the foundation of a new method of inquiry?
Abstract information is neither matter nor energy, yet it needs matter for its concrete embodiment and energy for its communication. Information is the modern spirit, the ghost in the machine. It is the stuff of thought, the immaterial substance of philosophy.
Over 100 years ago, Bertrand Russell, with the help of G. E. MooreAlfred North Whitehead, and Ludwig Wittgenstein, proposed logic and language as the proper foundational basis, not only of philosophy, but also of mathematics and science. Their logical positivism and the variation called logical empiricism developed by Rudolf Carnap and the Vienna Circle have proved to be failures in grounding philosophy, mathematics, or science.
Information is a powerful diagnostic tool. It is a better abstract basis for philosophy, and for science as well, especially physics, biology, and neuroscience. It is capable of answering questions about metaphysics (the ontology of things themselves), epistemology (the existential status of ideas and how we know them), and idealism itself.
Information philosophy is not a solution to specific problems in philosophy. I-Phi is a new philosophical method, capable of solving multiple problems in both philosophy and physics.
It needs young practitioners, presently tackling some problem, who might investigate that problem using this new methodology. Note that, just as the philosophy of language is not linguistic philosophy, I-Phi is not the philosophy of information, which is mostly about computers and cognitive science.
The language philosophers of the twentieth century thought that they could solve (or at leastdissolve) the classical problems of philosophy. They did not succeed. Information philosophy, by comparison, now has cast a great deal of light on some of those problems. It needs more information philosophers to make more progress.


To recap, when information is stored in any structure, two fundamental physical processes occur. First is a "collapse" of a quantum mechanical wave function, reducing multiple possibilities to a single actuality. Second is a local decrease in the entropy corresponding to the increase in information. Entropy greater than that must be transferred away from the new information structure to satisfy the second law of thermodynamics.
These quantum level processes are susceptible to noise. Information stored may have errors. When information is retrieved, it is again susceptible to noise. This may garble the information content. In information science, noise is generally the enemy of information. But some noise is the friend of freedom, since it is the source of novelty, of creativity and invention, and of variation in the biological gene pool.
Biological systems have maintained and increased their invariant information content over billions of generations, coming as close to immortality as living things can. Philosophers and scientists have increased our knowledge of the external world, despite logical, mathematical, and physical uncertainty. They have created and externalized information (knowledge) that can in principle become immortal. Both life and mind create information in the face of noise. Both do it with sophisticated error detection and correction schemes. The scheme we use to correct human knowledge is science, a two-stage combination of freely invented theories andadequately determined experiments. Information philosophy follows that example.

If you have read this far, you probably already know that the Information Philosopher website is an exercise in information sharing. It has seven parts, each with multiple chapters. Navigation at the bottom of each page will take you to the next or previous part or chapter.Teacher and Scholar links display additional material on some pages, and reveal hidden footnotes on some pages. The footnotes themselves are in the Scholar section.
Our goal is for the website to contain all the great philosophical discussions of our three main ideas, plus preliminary solutions for several classic problems in philosophy and physics, with primary source materials (in the original languages) where possible.
Philosophers who would like to develop their expertise in information philosophy should inquire into support possibilities by writing Bob Doyle, the founder of information philosophy.
Support options include online training sessions by Skype or Google Hangouts, perhaps published to YouTube.
Preferences will be given to current graduate students in philosophy or science - physics, biology, psychology, especially - and current post-docs.
All original content on Information Philosopher is available for your use, without requesting
permission, under a Creative Commons Attribution License.     cc by
Copyrights for all excerpted and quoted works remain with their authors and publishers.